El Juicio de demarcación de linderos y su consecuencia al trámite ordinario ajeno a los principios Constitucionales de celeridad y la debida deligencia.

Abstract

This research work is based on a legal, critical study and doctrinaire about the trial of demarcation of boundaries and therefore the foreign ordinary procedure to the constitutional principles of speed and due diligence. From the legal perspective, to seek information through the use of scientific gathering techniques (bibliographic records and mnemonic), which They allowed the development of the theoretical part, contained in several chapters; and, by applying the technique of field (survey) was collected information legal professionals dedicated to practice their profession, who mostly hold that:. -The Art 666 to 673 contain to constitute constraints and boundary demarcation, which threatens the rights of property owners inmuebles.‖, becoming essential that the National Assembly review the legal regulations and materially suits and formal rules to this legal rights family. Based on this theory, legal framework and review of information collected, a legal proposal to allow a possible reform takes shape Legal Civil Code, on the need to establish that Art. 671.- If the parties do not agree on any settlement or the cause is found in the case of previous article, will run record of everything that happened in the inspection and what who had observed the judge. Added to process the original statements, documents and the report expert, shall be conveyed to the parties to make their arguments in the within three days, after which judgment will be rendered in the merit of everything autos‖ acted and constant.